Risk Management Strategies and Supplier Selection in Public Sector Procurement
Evidence from the Lower Benue River Basin Development Authority, Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-766220263652Palavras-chave:
Risk management, Risk retention, Risk sharing, Supplier selection, Public procurementResumo
This study investigates the effect of risk management strategies - specifically risk retention and risk sharing - on supplier selection in the Lower Benue River Basin Development Authority (LBRBDA), Makurdi. Motivated by the growing emphasis on effective supplier selection in public procurement and the need to mitigate procurement-related risks, the study adopts a correlational survey design. A census approach was employed due to the manageable population size (N = 101), with 86 valid responses received, representing an 85.1% response rate. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis. Findings reveal that both risk retention and risk sharing significantly influence supplier selection, with risk sharing having a more pronounced impact. The results highlight the importance of adopting a strategic and collaborative approach to risk management in public procurement. It is concluded that while risk retention facilitates internal operational flexibility, risk sharing enhances trust and supplier performance. The study recommends institutionalizing risk-sharing practices and applying risk retention selectively within a comprehensive risk governance framework.
Referências
Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023
Bajari, P., & Tadelis, S. (2001). Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. The RAND Journal of Economics, 32(3), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2696361
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bracci, E., Bruno, A., D’Amore, G., & Ievoli, R. (2024). The integration of performance management and risk management in the public sector: An empirical case. Journal of Management Control, 35(1), 137–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-024-00369-2
Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2015). Enterprise risk management: Review, critique, and research directions. Long Range Planning, 48(4), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.07.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.07.005
Carr, A. S., & Pearson, J. N. (1999). Strategically managed buyer–supplier relationships and performance outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, 17(5), 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00007-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00007-8
Cervitude. (2024). Unlocking opportunities: The role of feasibility studies in government contracting. Retrieved July 18, 2025, from https://cervitude.com/2024/02/22/unlocking-opportunities-the-role-of-feasibility-studies-in-government-contracting
Chinogwenya, R., & Utete, R. (2023). Effective procurement management and organisational performance: Perspectives of supply chain personnel. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(6), 1859–1870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i6.904
Chowdhury, A. R. (2025). A systematic review of risk-based procurement strategies in retail supply chains. American Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Solutions, 1(1), 466–505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63125/jr03rv07
Colivicchi, I., Fabbri, T., & Iannizzotto, A. (2024). Risk retention and management implications of medical malpractice in the Italian health service. Risks, 12(10), 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12100160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12100160
David, R. J., & Han, S. K. (2004). A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.359
Defense Business Board. (2025). Supply chain illumination: Report on the Department of Defense’s supply chain efforts and recommendations. U.S. Department of Defense. Retrieved July 22, 2025, from https://dbb.defense.gov/Portals/35/Documents/Reports/2025/
Essien, E. E., Konstantopoulou, A., Konstopoulos, I., & Lodorfos, G. (2018). The influence of business and political ties on supplier selection decisions. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 13(1–2), 71–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2018.095859
Ghadge, A., Dani, S., Ojha, R., & Caldwell, N. (2017). Using risk sharing contracts for supply chain risk mitigation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 103, 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.11.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.11.034
Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258627
Gurtu, A., & Johny, J. (2021). Supply chain risk management: Literature review. Risks, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9010016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9010016
Harun, M., Salema, G., & Matto, M. (2025). Achieving desired compliance performance in public procurement. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00241-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00444-7
Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision-making approaches. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009
Hopkin, P. (2018). Fundamentals of risk management (5th ed.). Kogan Page.
IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
Kaplan, R. S., & Mikes, A. (2020). Managing risks: A new framework. Harvard Business School Publishing.
Kaplan, R. S., & Mikes, A. (2016). Risk management—The revealing hand. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12155
Khan, O., & Burnes, B. (2007). Risk and supply chain management. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 18(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090710816931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090710816931
Manavalan, E., & Jayakrishna, K. (2019). A review of IoT embedded sustainable supply chain. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, 925–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.030
Matas, J., Perez, N., Ruiz, L., & Riquelme-Medina, M. (2024). Firm disruption orientation and supply chain resilience. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 39(13), 82–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-10-2023-0562
Maganga, D. C., Kitheka, S., & Ndolo, J. (2024). Influence of supplier responsiveness. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(2), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-07-2023-0375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.2.49
Mumassabba, J., Mukulu, E., & Atikiya, R. (2022). Risk retention strategy and competitiveness. International Academic Journal of Human Resource and Business Administration, 4(1), 466–481.
Mutenga, S., & Staikouras, S. K. (2007). Catastrophe risk financing theory. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 32(2), 222–245. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510127
Mwalukasa, B. E., & Sallwa, A. A. (2024). Effects of procurement risk management strategies. Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil, 23, e3497. https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-766220243497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-7662202434971
Ondieki, M. A., Biraori, O. E., & Priscilla, M. (2023). Supplier’s past performance criteria. East African Journal of Business and Economics, 6(1), 162–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37284/eajbe.6.1.1287
Osei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A. P. (2016). Developing transport infrastructure. Transport Reviews, 36(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1077280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1077288
Panjaitan, D. S., Bahagia, N., Raja, A. C. A., & Abduh, M. (2024). Total cost of ownership factors. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 484, p. 01022). EDP Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448401022
Paraskeva, S., & Tsoulfas, G. T. (2025). Mitigating risks in public procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 25(1), 140–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-07-2023-0054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-07-2024-0074
Patsanza, E. (2019). Mitigating financial risk using construction bonds. RICS Construction Journal. Retrieved July 18, 2025, from https://ww3.rics.org/uk/en/journals/construction-journal/mitigating-financial-risk-using-construction-bonds.html
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.249
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” useful? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011928
Ram, J., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Belt and road initiative supply chain risks. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(4), 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-03-2019-0072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-12-2019-0366
Sodhi, M. S., & Chopra, S. (2004). Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), 53–61.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tummala, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2011). Supply chain risk management process. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(6), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111171165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111171165
Tyozenda, A., Adadu, C., & Faajir, A. (2025). Effect of risk management strategies on supplier selection. 360: Revista de Ciencias de la Gestión, 10(10), 1–21.
Usman, A. O., Fadun, O. S., & Aduloju, S. A. (2024). Risk retention strategy and financial performance. Nigerian Journal of Risk and Insurance, 14(1), 41–62.
Vandenbroucke, S., Pluut, H., Erkens, Y., & Kantorowicz, J. (2024). Do companies walk the talk? International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 9(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00092-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00103-0
Wilhelm, M. (2024). Mandatory due diligence legislation. Journal of International Business Policy, 7(4), 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-023-00169-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-024-00193-4
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. University of Illinois.
Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization. American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/227496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227496
Wind, Y., & Saaty, T. L. (1980). Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 26(7), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.7.641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.7.641
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista pertencem ao(s) respectivo(s) autor(es), com direitos de primeira publicação cedidos para a Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil - RCCC. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com obrigatoriedade de reconhecimento da autoria original e da publicação inicial nesta revista. A revista permitirá o uso dos trabalhos publicados, incluindo direito de enviar o trabalho para bases de dados de acesso público. O conteúdo dos artigos publicados são de total e exclusiva responsabilidade dos autores.
- O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
- O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
- A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
- É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigo às normas da publicação.
Esta obra está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
