The impact of the introduction of market makers on the negotiations of the Brazilian depositary receipts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-766220192804Keywords:
Market Makers, Liquidity, Chow’s Test, Brazilian Depositary Receipts.Abstract
The present study aims to analyze the effect generated in the liquidity of the Brazilian Depositary Receipts (BDRs) with the introduction of market makers for these stocks. The sample of this study was composed by the BDRs with at least 200 days of negotiations before and after the hiring of the market makers, thus reaching the final number of 42 BDRs, between the years of 2010 and 2017. For the stocks of the sample were obtained the historical series of liquidity proxies, bid-ask-spread, number of trades and volume, an AR (1) model was then estimated for each BDR, and then the Chow test was used to test the stability of the model’s parameters. The results found in the Chow test showed that, for a 99% confidence level, 29 BDRs, that is, 69% of the BDRs studied, had abrupt and statistically significant changes in bid-ask-spread, 23 BDRs (55 %) showed significant changes in the number of deals and 22 BDRs (52%) showed significant changes in volume. When the confidence level was relaxed to 95%, 32 BDRs (76%) presented changes in the bid-ask-spread, 29 BDRs (69%) had changes in the number of deals and 29 BDRs, that is, 69% had statistically significant changes in volume. This result presents, therefore, strong evidence on the influence of market makers on the market liquidity of the BDRs, showing that the hiring of market makers can increase liquidity and contribute significantly to the negotiations of these papers.References
Ambrozini, M. A., Gaio, L. E., Bonacim, C. A. G., & Cicconi, E. G. (2009). Impacto dos formadores de mercado sobre a Liquidez das Ações Negociadas na Bolsa de Valores de São Paulo. Contabilidade Vista & Revista, 20(3), 15-38.
Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1986). Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread. Journal of financial Economics, 17(2), 223-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90065-6
Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1991). Liquidity, asset prices and financial policy. Financial Analysts Journal, 47(6), 56-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v47.n6.56
Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (2008). Liquidity, the value of the firm, and corporate finance. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 20(2), 32-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2008.00179.x
Amihud, Y., & Mendelson, H. (1987). Trading mechanisms and stock returns: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Finance, 42(3), 533-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04567.x
Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(81)90018-0
Box, G. E., & Jenkis, G. M. (1970). Time series analysis for casting and control. San Francisco, Holden Day (44), 575.
Brasil Bolsa Balcão (B3). BDRs – Brazilian Depositary Receipts. Recuperado em 11 dezembro, 2017, de http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br/pt_br/listagem/bdrs-brazilian-depositary-receipts/.
Chordia, T., Subrahmanyam, A., & Anshuman, V. R. (2001). Trading activity and expected stock returns. Journal of financial Economics, 59(1), 3-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00080-5
Chow, G. C. (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 28(6), 591-605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1910133
Clark-Joseph, A. D., Ye, M., & Zi, C. (2017). Designated market makers still matter: Evidence from two natural experiments. Journal of Financial Economics, 126(3), 652-667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.09.001
Copeland, T. E., & Galai, D. (1983). Information effects on the bid?ask spread. The Journal of Finance, 38(5), 1457-1469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb03834.x
Correia, L. F., Amaral, H. F., & Bressan, A. A. (2008). O efeito da liquidez sobre a rentabilidade de mercado das ações negociadas no mercado acionário brasileiro. BASE–Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, 5(2), 109-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4013/base.20082.03
Costa, A. C., & Salles, A. A. (2010, Setembro). Um Exame da Influência do Formador de Mercado no Risco de Liquidez de Ações Negociadas. Anais do Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Produção, São Carlos, SP, Brasil, 30
Demsetz, H. (1968). The cost of transacting. The quarterly journal of economics, 82(1), 33-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1882244
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x
Fama, E. F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. The journal of finance, 46(5), 1575-1617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x
Garman, M. B. (1976). Market microstructure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(3), 257-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90006-4
Glosten, L. R. (1989). Insider trading, liquidity, and the role of the monopolist specialist. Journal of Business, 62(2), 211-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/296460
Glosten, L. R., & Milgrom, P. R. (1985). Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of financial economics, 14(1), 71-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90044-3
Jun, S. G., Marathe, A., & Shawky, H. A. (2003). Liquidity and stock returns in emerging equity markets. Emerging Markets Review, 4(1), 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-0141(02)00060-2
Kyle, A. S. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 53(6), 1315-1335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913210
Machado, M. A. V., & Medeiros, O. R. (2011). Modelos de precificação de ativos e o efeito liquidez: evidências empíricas no mercado acionário brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Finanças, 9(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12660/rbfin.v9n3.2011.2862
Madhavan, A. (2000). Market microstructure: A survey. Journal of Financial Markets, 3(3), 205-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(00)00007-0
Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The journal of finance, 7(1), 77-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
Martins, G. A., & Theóphilo, C. R. (2007). Metodologia da investigação científica para Ciências Sociais Aplicadas. São Paulo, Brasil: Atlas.
Morais, I. A., & Portugal, M. S. (1999). Modelagem e previsão de volatilidade determinística e estocástica para a série do Ibovespa. Journal of Economic Literature, 29(3), 303-341.
Neves, L. C. (2007). Estudo Empírico sobre o Comportamento do retorno e da liquidez média das ações no Mercado Acionário Brasileiro das Empresas que emitiram ADRs na NYSE e das que aderiram ao Novo Mercado. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.
O’Hara, M. (1995). Market Microstructure Theory. (1a. ed.). Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
Pereira, A. J., Neto. (2006). Testes de estrutura ótima de capital em empresas brasileiras: o efeito de liquidez, desempenho do mercado acionário e assimetria de informação nas decisões de financiamento. Tese de Doutorado, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Perlin, M. (2013). Os efeitos da introdução de agentes de liquidez no mercado acionário brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Finanças, 11(2), 281-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12660/rbfin.v11n2.2013.4088
Perotti, P., & Rindi, B. (2010). Market makers as information providers: The natural experiment of STAR. Journal of Empirical Finance, 17(5), 895-917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2010.07.002
Radner, R. (1979). Rational expectations equilibrium: Generic existence and the information revealed by prices. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 655-678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1910413
Rogers, P., & Mamede, S. D. P. N. (2014). Ineficiência informacional e/ou valor da liquidez? Estudo da atuação dos formadores de mercado no Brasil. Anais do Encontro Brasileiro de Finanças. Recife, PE, Brasil, 14.
Sanvitto, M. A. (2011). Formadores de mercado como agentes provedores de liquidez e de valor: um confronto entre teoria e realidade. Monografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Silva, V. A. D. (2012). Uma análise sobre a liquidez e a volatilidade das ações de empresas que contrataram formadores de mercado. Monografia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
Siqueira, L. S., Amaral, H. F., & Correia, L. F. (2017). The effect of asymmetric information risk on returns of stocks traded on the BM&FBOVESPA. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 28(75), 425-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201705230
Stoll, H. R. (1978). The supply of dealer services in securities markets. The Journal of Finance, 33(4), 1133-1151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb02053.x
Venkataraman, K., & Waisburd, A. C. (2007). The value of the designated market maker. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42(3), 735-758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000004166
Vieira, K. M., & Milach, F. T. (2008). Liquidez/Iliquidez no Mercado Brasileiro: Comportamento no Período 1995-2005 e suas Relações com o Retorno. BASE–Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da Unisinos, 5(3), 5-16.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright for articles published in this journal belongs to the author (s), with first publication rights assigned to Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil. Due to appearing in this publicly accessible journal, articles are free to use, with mandatory recognition of the original authorship and initial publication in this magazine and for educational and non-commercial applications. The magazine chose to use published works for non-commercial purposes, including the right to submit or work for publicly accessible databases. The content of published articles is the sole and exclusive responsibility of the authors. - The author (s) authorize (s) a publication of the article in the journal; - The author (s) guarantee (s) that a contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not being evaluated in another magazine (s); - A magazine is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, for the full responsibility of the author (s); - It is reserved to the editors or the right to make textual adjustments and to adjust the article to the publication rules.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional.
