Crowding-out effect between income policies and public services budgets in OECD countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-766220243408Keywords:
Income Policies, Welfare State, Social Protection, Public services, OECDAbstract
Challenges such as globalization and the digital economy are affecting the labor market and causing social exclusion. Thus, the relevance of income policies, which are responsible for the citizens’ financial security, is understood. This study aimed to evaluate the budget expansion of income policies between 1970 and 2019 and verify if there is a crowding-out effect between their budget and public services from 2000 to 2019 in OECD countries. The theoretical framework addressed the welfare state, income policies, budget disputes and austerity, and the crowding-out and crowding-in (complementarity) effects. Methodologically, descriptive and graphical analyses, correlation analyses, Granger causality tests, and GMM system short panel regression were used. The results indicated an expansion of income policy budgets, emphasizing investments in social security and pension systems. Also, a mixed relationship was observed between the acceptance of the crowding-out hypothesis and income policies and public services, with a tendency to exclude public services for expansion in income policies. Limitations were observed due to the lack of some data from the broad database used.
References
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data:monte carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2020). Boa economia para tempos difíceis (1a ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). GMM Estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, 19(3), 321-340.
Blyth, M. (2017). Austeridade: a história de uma ideia perigosa. Trad. José Antônio Freitas e Silva. Autonomia Literária.
Bonoli, G., & Reber, F. (2010). The political economy of childcare in OECD countries: Explaining cross-national variation in spending and coverage rates. European Journal of Political Research, 49(1), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01884.x
Botelho, L. H. F., Rodrigues, C., Braga, G., & Costa, T. de M. T. da. (2020). Análise do Acesso às Políticas Sociais, Desenvolvimento e Igualdade nas Capitais dos Estados Brasileiros. XLIV ENCONTRO DA ANPAD – EnANPAD, Online.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2017). Depois do capitalismo financeiro-rentista, mudança estrutural à vista? Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 36(1), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.25091/s0101-3300201700010007
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2018). Capitalismo financeiro-rentista. Estudos Avançados, 32(92), 17-29.
Busemeyer, M. R., & Garritzmann, J. L. (2017). The effecT of economic globalizaTion on compensaTory and social invesTmenT policies compared: a multi-level analysis of oecd countries (Issue February).
Carvalho, L. (2020). Curto-circuito: o vírus e a volta do Estado. Todavia.
Castles, F. G. (2005). Social expenditure in the 1990s: Data and determinants. Policy & Politics, 33(3), 411-430.
Castles, F. G. (2009). What welfare states do: A disaggregated expenditure approach. Journal of Social Policy, 38(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279408002547
De Bolle, M. B. (2020). A pilha de areia: ruptura. Intrínseca.
Draibe, S. M., & Riesco, M. (2011). Estados de Bem-Estar social e estratégias de desenvolvimento na América Latina. Um novo desenvolvimentismo em gestação? Sociologias, 27, 220-254. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-45222011000200009
Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). As três economias políticas do Welfare State. In The theree worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, Princeton university press.
Esping-Andersen, G. et al. (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farla, K., de Crombrugghe, D., & Verspagen, B. (2016). Institutions, Foreign Direct Investment, and Domestic Investment: Crowding Out or Crowding In? World Development, 88, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.04.008
Fernandez, R. N., Shikida, C., Rauter Menezes, G., & Martins de Almeida, R. H. (2018). Análise dos Efeitos Crowding-in e Crowding-out para a Economia Brasileira. SINERGIA - Revista Do Instituto de Ciências Econômicas, Administrativas e Contábeis, 21(2), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.17648/sinergia-2236-7608-v21n2-7349
Gonzalez, L. & Barreira, B. (2020). Efeitos do auxílio emergencial sobre a renda: excessivas são a pobreza e a desigualdade, não o auxílio. FGV-EAESP.
Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric, 37(3), 424-438.
Hemerijck. (2017). A Revolução silenciosa do paradigma de investimento social na União Europeia. In P.H. de A. Rodrigues, I. S. Santos (Org). Políticas e riscos sociais no Brasil e na Europa: convergências e divergências. Editora Hucitec (pp. 25-60).
Hossain, T., & Li, K. K. (2014). Crowding out in the labor market: A prosocial setting is necessary. Management Science, 60(5), 1148-1160. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1807
Kautto, M. (2002). Investing in services in West European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(1), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952872002012001636
Kerstenetzky, C. L., & Guedes, G. P. (2018). O Welfare State resiste? Desenvolvimentos recentes do estado social nos países da OCDE Is the Welfare State resisting? Recent developments of the social state in OECD countries. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva, 23(7), 2095-2106.
Khoma, N., & Vdovychyn, I. (2020). Deconstruction of the welfare state: The impact of globalization and technological factors. Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku, 27(3), 269-285. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v27i3.1696
Kim, Y. Y., & Choi, Y. J. (2020). Does social protection crowd out social investment? Policy and Society, 39(2), 208-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1677377
Martinelli, L. A. (2020). A Basic Income Trilemma: Affordability, Adequacy, and the Advantages of Radically Simplified Welfare. Journal of Social Policy, 49(3), 461-482.
Noel, A. (2019). The Politics of Minimum Income Protection in OECD Countries. Journal of Social Policy, 4(2), 227-227.
OCDE. (2021). Declaração do Secretário-Geral da OCDE, Mathias Cormann, sobre o resultado da Reunião de Ministros das Finanças do G7.
Parijs, V. P., & Vanderborght, Y. (2018). Renda básica: uma proposta radical para uma sociedade livre e economia sã. Cortez.
Paterson, B. (2015). Questioning the common sense: was Scottish independence really an alternative to UK neoliberalisation. Capital & Class, 39(3), 493-514.
Pase, H. L., & Melo, C. C. (2017). Políticas públicas de transferência de renda na América Latina. Revista de Administração Pública, 51(2), 312-329. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612150770
Piketty, T. (2014). O capital no século XXI (1a ed.). Intrínseca.
Polivka, L., & Luo, B. (2015). The Neoliberal Political Economy and Erosion of Retirement Security. The Gerontologist, 55(2).
Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0900900106
Roque, D. M., & Ferreira, M. A. M. (2015). O que realmente importa em programas de transferência condicionada de renda? Abordagens em diferentes países. Saúde e Sociedade, 24, 1193-1207.
Rossi, P., Dwech, E., & Arante, F. (2018). Economia Política da Austeridade. In Economia para Poucos: Impactos Sociais da Austeridade e Alternativas para o Brasil. Editora autonomia literária.
Salvador, E. da S. (2017). O desmonte do financiamento da seguridade social em contexto de ajuste fiscal. Serviço Social & Sociedade, 130, 426-446. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-6628.117
Saraceno, F., Semmler, W., & Young, B. (2020). European economic, fiscal, and social policy at the crossroads. Constellations, 27(4), 573-593. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12540
Silva, F. Q., & Cabral, B. P. (2021). P&D e Produtividade na Indústria de Saúde Humana no Mundo. 1210-1223. https://doi.org/10.5151/v-enei-699
Suplicy, E. M. (2004). Renda Básica de Cidadania: a saída é pela porta (3a ed.). Cortez Editora.
Wang, X., Williamson, J. B., & Cansoy, M. (2016). Developing countries and systemic pension reforms: Reflections on some emerging problems. International Social Security Review, 69.
Wispelaere, J. de, & Stirton, L. (2017). When Basic Income Meets Professor Pangloss: Ignoring Public Administration and Its Perils. Political Quarterly, 88(2), 298-305.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright for articles published in this journal belongs to the author (s), with first publication rights assigned to Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil. Due to appearing in this publicly accessible journal, articles are free to use, with mandatory recognition of the original authorship and initial publication in this magazine and for educational and non-commercial applications. The magazine chose to use published works for non-commercial purposes, including the right to submit or work for publicly accessible databases. The content of published articles is the sole and exclusive responsibility of the authors. - The author (s) authorize (s) a publication of the article in the journal; - The author (s) guarantee (s) that a contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not being evaluated in another magazine (s); - A magazine is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts emitted in the texts, for the full responsibility of the author (s); - It is reserved to the editors or the right to make textual adjustments and to adjust the article to the publication rules.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional.
