Socio-environmental drivers of business combinations

a comparative study of evidence from polluting companies listed on the stock markets of Brazil and China

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-766220253613

Keywords:

Socio-environmental motivators, Business combinations, Stock market

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to compare evidence on the disclosure of socio-environmental drivers of business combinations among publicly traded Brazilian companies with polluting potential to findings from studies on the disclosure of socio-environmental drivers by publicly listed Chinese companies operating in polluting sectors. For this purpose, a qualitative approach based on documentary content analysis of corporate disclosures was employed. The study examined 100 business combinations over a ten-year period (2010–2019), involving 150 companies—50 acquirers and 100 targets. It analyzed 15 industrial sectors in Brazil with polluting potential, as defined by Law No. 10.165 (2000). The findings indicate that Chinese publicly traded companies with polluting characteristics demonstrated a higher level of disclosure regarding socio-environmental practices in their business combinations compared to Brazilian companies. Additional results suggest that business combinations driven by socio-environmental motives among Chinese companies were more likely to occur in contexts involving highly polluting factors and products than those undertaken by Brazilian firms. Brazil is gradually moving toward the adoption of practices and discussions surrounding socio-environmentally motivated business combinations in publicly traded companies operating in potentially polluting sectors. However, China shows a more advanced integration of socio-environmental motives into the business combination strategies of its publicly listed polluting-sector companies. The primary contribution of this research lies in its discussion of how socio-environmental (sustainable) business combinations can play a fundamental role in minimizing environmental degradation and conserving planetary resources, while potentially raising corporate awareness of social responsibility. The study offers a comparative perspective on the contexts of Brazil and China. Furthermore, it fosters contemporary reflections on the disclosure of financial, accounting, environmental, and social information, highlighting the interaction between Social and Environmental Accounting and Financial Accounting for external users in both countries.

References

Barros, V., Matos, P. V., Sarmento, J. M., & Vieira, P. R. (2022). M&A activity as a driver for better ESG performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121338

Beuren, I. M., de Moura, G. D., & Theis, V. (2016). Remuneração dos executivos em empresas que realizaram combinação de negócios. Revista de Administração da UNIMEP, 14(2), 1–30. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=273746863001

Brasil Ecodiesel Indústria e Comércio de Biocombustíveis e Óleos Vegetais S.A. (2010). Demonstrações Financeiras Padronizadas de 31 de dezembro de 2010. https://www.rad.cvm.gov.br/ENET/frmGerenciaPaginaFRE.aspx?NumeroSequencialDocumento=9555&CodigoTipoInstituicao=1

Brazil Pharma S.A. (2012). Protocolo de Incorporação e Instrumento de Justificação de Incorporação de Ações de Emissão da Drogaria Guararapes Brasil S.A. pela Brazil Pharma S.A. https://www.rad.cvm.gov.br/ENET/frmExibirArquivoIPEExterno.aspx?NumeroProtocoloEntrega=324418

Chen, X., Liu, H., & Du, W. (2025). Does managerial myopia affect firms’ green merger and acquisition? Evidence from Chinese firms in high-polluting industries. Transnational Corporations Review, 17(1), 200115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200115

Christofi, M., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., & Shams, S. R. (2019). Triggering technological innovation through cross-border mergers and acquisitions: a micro-foundational perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.026

Comitê Brasileiro de Pronunciamentos de Sustentabilidade. (2024). Pronunciamento Técnico CBPS 01, de 29 de outubro de 2024. Requisitos Gerais para Divulgação de Informações Financeiras Relacionadas à Sustentabilidade. https://www.facpcs.org.br/CBPS/Documentos-Emitidos/Pronunciamentos/Pronunciamento?Id=159

Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis. (2011). Pronunciamento Técnico CPC 15, de 3 de junho de 2011. Combinação de Negócios. https://static.cpc.aatb.com.br/Documentos/235_CPC_15_R1_rev%2013.pdf

Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis. (2012). Pronunciamento Técnico CPC 36, de 7 de dezembro de 2012. Demonstrações Consolidadas. https://static.cpc.aatb.com.br/Documentos/448_CPC_36_R3_rev%2008.pdf

Correa, J. C., Gonçalves, M. N., & Moraes, R. O. (2015). Disclosure ambiental das companhias do setor de petróleo, gás e biocombustíveis listadas na BM&FBovespa: uma análise à luz da Teoria da Legitimidade. Revista de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade, 4(3), 139–154.

Costa, F. M., & Amorim Júnior, R. L. (2020). Reorganizações Societárias e Agressividade Tributária. Revista Evidenciação Contábil & Finanças, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2318-1001.2020v8n3.51368

D’Alauro, G. (2020). Italian Utilities and Public Control: Evidence of Merger Effects. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(7), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1644517

Eletropaulo Metropolitana Eletricidade de São Paulo S.A. (2019). Demonstrações Financeiras Padronizadas de 30 de dezembro de 2019. https://www.rad.cvm.gov.br/ENET/frmGerenciaPaginaFRE.aspx?NumeroSequencialDocumento=91136&CodigoTipoInstituicao

Fasolin, L. B., Brizolla, M. M. B., da Silva, A., & Klann, R. C. (2020). Características de companhias: práticas de combinação de negócios. Revista de Contabilidade e Controladoria, 11(2).

Fikru, M. G., & Gautier, L. (2021). Electric utility mergers in the presence of distributed renewable energy. Energy Economics, 101, 105436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105436

Gray, R. (1992). Accounting and environmentalism: an exploration of the challenge of gently accounting for accountability, transparency and sustainability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90038-T

Gray, R. (1994). Corporate reporting for sustainable development: accounting for sustainability in 2000AD. Environmental values, 3(1), 17–45. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327194776679782

Gray, R. (2001). Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: what (if anything) have we learnt? Business ethics: A European review, 10(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00207

Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(3–4), 327–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00376

Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579510146996

He, S., Wei, Y., & Li, W. (2024). Research on the impact of green mergers and acquisitions of heavily polluting enterprises on the quality of environmental information disclosure: empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04525-5

Helfaya, A., & Moussa, T. (2017). Do board's corporate social responsibility strategy and orientation influence environmental sustainability disclosure? UK evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1061–1077. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1960

Hossain, M. S. (2021). Merger & Acquisitions (M&As) as an important strategic vehicle in business: Thematic areas, research avenues & possible suggestions. Journal of Economics and Business, 106004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2021.106004

Hu, J., Fang, Q., & Wu, H. (2023). Environmental tax and highly polluting firms' green transformation: evidence from green mergers and acquisitions. Energy Economics, 127, 107046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107046

Hu, M., & Huang, M. (2025). How do green acquisitions facilitate enterprise carbon emission reductions? Finance Research Letters, 79, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107306

Islam, M. A. (2017). Disclosures of social value creation and managing legitimacy: a case study of three global social enterprises. Australian Accounting Review, 27(3), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12130

Janowicz, M. (2022). To disclose or not to disclose? To what extent information about business combinations matters on example of Polish companies. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 1891–1900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.247

João Fortes Engenharia S.A (2012). Protocolo e Justificação de Incorporação de Ações de Emissão da Incorporadora Pinheiro Pereira S.A. pela João Fortes Engenharia S.A. https://www.rad.cvm.gov.br/ENET/frmExibirArquivoIPEExterno.aspx?NumeroProtocoloEntrega=338108

Lei n.º 10.165 (2000). Altera a Lei no 6.938, de 31 de agosto de 1981, que dispõe sobre a Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente, seus fins e mecanismos de formulação e aplicação, e dá outras providências. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l10165.htm

Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025). Does the failure of corporate mergers and acquisitions affect innovation efficiency. International Review of Financial Analysis, 97, 103821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103821.

Liu, D., Xiong, Y., Wang, L., & Yao, S. (2025). Corporate carbon risk and green M&As. Research in International Business and Finance, 75, 102714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102714

Lu, J. (2021). Can the green merger and acquisition strategy improve the environmental protection investment of listed company? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86, 106470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106470

Lu, J. (2022). Green merger and acquisition and export expansion: Evidence from China's polluting enterprises. Sustainable production and consumption, 30, 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.024

Marconi, M. A., & Lakatos, E. M. (2019). Metodologia Científica (7ª ed.). Atlas.

Minutolo, M. C., Kristjanpoller, W. D., & Stakeley, J. (2019). Exploring environmental, social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2303

Monteiro, S. M. S., & Aibar‐Guzmán, B. (2010). Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(4), 185-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.197

Nascimento, F. P., & Sousa, F. L. L. (2015). Metodologia da pesquisa científica. Thesaurus.

Patten, D. M. (1991). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(91)90003-3

Rover, S., Murcia, F. D. R., & de Souza Murcia, F. C. (2015). The determinants of social and environmental disclosure practices: The Brazilian case. Environmental Quality Management, 25(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21406

Shen, H., Liang, Y., Li, H., Liu, J., & Lu, G. (2021). Does geopolitical risk promote mergers and acquisitions of listed companies in energy and electric power industries. Energy Economics, 95, 105115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105115

Somaiya, J., & Savani, R. (2019). Merger And Acquisition on Electricity Industry Outside India. Gap Interdisciplinarities, 2(4),46–52. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/jayesh-somaiya/publication/364346488mergerandacquisitiononelectricityindustryoutside_india/links/634d5ed46e0d367d91a5d223/merger-and-acquisition-on-electricity-industry-outside-india.pdf

Souza, M. M. D., & Borba, J. A. (2016). Value relevance do nível de disclosure das combinações de negócios e do goodwill reconhecido nas companhias de capital aberto brasileiras. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 28, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201703240

Souza, M. M., Rover, S., & Borba, J. A. (2016). Determinantes do nível de disclosure das combinações de negócios realizadas pelas empresas brasileiras de capital aberto. Race: Revista de Administração, Contabilidade e Economia, 15(3), 945–968. https://doi.org/10.18593/race.v15i3.7429

Sun, Z., Sun, X., Wang, W., & Wang, W. (2023). Source reduction strategy or end-of-pipe solution? The impact of green merger and acquisition on environmental investment strategy of Chinese heavily polluting enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 413, 137530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137530

Wang, X., Qiu, J., Qiu, Z., & Bao, W. (2025). Regulatory inquiry letters and green M&As of heavily polluting firms. Finance Research Letters, 78, 107183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107183

Xie, E., Reddy, K. S., & Liang, J. (2017). Country-specific determinants of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 127–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.12.005

Xu, Y., Wang, W., Gao, H., & Zhu, H. (2024). The Impact of Green Mergers and Acquisitions on Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from China’s Heavy-Polluting Industries. Sustainability, 16(9), 3796. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093796

Published

2025-06-18

How to Cite

Almeida, A. P. de, & Rover, S. (2025). Socio-environmental drivers of business combinations: a comparative study of evidence from polluting companies listed on the stock markets of Brazil and China. Revista Catarinense Da Ciência Contábil, 24, e3613. https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-766220253613

Issue

Section

Articles